Derek Walcott’s Omeros
is a contemporary epic poem that follows the stories of numerous characters as
they attempt to evolve alongside their island home of St. Lucia. However, the piece also moves characters
between place and time in an intricate attempt to show the interconnectivity of
the character’s situations, like the modernization of the island and the slave
trade of long ago. Walcott also
incorporates himself into the piece in order to give a unique point of view
into the lives of the characters that he both interacts with and has
created. Because of the complexities
that Walcott has created, there are obviously some questions that I have that
have been left unanswered (to me at least).
Here, I am now going to merely list a few of these questions in hopes
that they can be discussed in the future and some light can be shed onto their ambiguities.
·
If Omeros
is supposed to follow an epic tradition, where can we see supernatural
involvement as is synonymous with the form laid out in the Greco-Roman style?
·
What is the overarching theme of Walcott’s
piece? What was Walcott’s purpose in
writing Omeros?
·
Are we expected to see each individual palimpsest
drawn to a conclusion? Or are we
supposed to accept that not each individual story concludes entirely at the
expense of discovering an overlying theme (which I also do not understand)?
·
What purpose does the killing of Hector and
Maud play in the piece? Is it merely as
a tool of conveying the despair of those close to them?
No comments:
Post a Comment